Imagine leasing a commercial property in one of Dubai's busiest business districts and receiving no rent for eight months. That was the situation behind a recent case before the Dubai Rental Disputes Centre (RDC), where a tenant was ordered to vacate a Business Bay property after accumulating Dh2.415 million in unpaid rent.

The tenant attempted to settle the full outstanding amount, but the offer and deposit came after the applicable 30-day notice period had expired. The First Instance Committee ruled that the late payment attempt did not prevent eviction.

The decision highlights an important part of Dubai's rental framework: tenants must respond to formal payment notices within the applicable timeframe, while landlords need to follow the correct legal procedures before seeking possession of their property.

Here's what happened, what Article 25 of Dubai's tenancy law says, and what the ruling means for landlords and tenants.

The Business Bay Case: How a Dh2.4 Million Rent Dispute Unfolded

The dispute involved a commercial tenancy agreement with a total rental value of Dh2,415,000. According to the reported case details, the tenant had not made any rental payments from the beginning of the tenancy. After eight months, the entire amount remained outstanding.

No Rent Paid From the Start

The tenant failed to pay rent throughout the first eight months of the commercial tenancy, leaving the full contractual rental amount unpaid.

For the landlord, this meant pursuing the formal legal process to recover the outstanding rent and regain possession of the property.

The Landlord Served a 30-Day Notice

The landlord issued a formal notice demanding that the tenant either settle the outstanding rent or vacate the premises within 30 days of receiving the notice.

The tenant did not settle the amount within that period.

The Tenant Attempted to Pay After the Deadline

During the proceedings, the tenant submitted a certificate showing an offer and deposit of the full outstanding rent. The document was intended to demonstrate an attempt to meet the payment obligation.

However, the First Instance Committee found that the offer and deposit had been made after the 30-day period had expired. The late attempt did not prevent the eviction order.

What Did the Committee Decide?

The committee ordered the tenant to:

  • Vacate the commercial premises and hand them over free of occupants and belongings.
  • Pay additional rent at the applicable annual contractual rate until the actual eviction date.
  • Pay the relevant fees and costs.

The decision illustrates how the timing of a payment response can affect a rental dispute. It also shows why landlords and tenants should keep proper records and follow the required procedures.

What Dubai Rental Law Says About Unpaid Rent and Eviction

Dubai's landlord-tenant relationship is governed by Law No. 26 of 2007, as amended by Law No. 33 of 2008.

One of the key provisions for rental disputes involving unpaid rent is Article 25(1)(a). It allows a landlord to seek eviction before the tenancy contract expires if the tenant fails to pay the rent, or any part of it, within 30 days from the date the payment notice is served, unless the parties have agreed otherwise.

How the 30-Day Eviction Notice Rule Works

The 30-day period is an important part of the legal process.

A few details deserve attention:

The period starts when the notice is served. The 30 days are calculated from the date the tenant receives the formal payment notice, rather than simply from the original rent due date.

The method of service matters. Article 25 specifies service through a Notary Public or registered mail for this eviction ground. Landlords should retain evidence showing when the notice was served.

Eviction is not automatic. If the tenant does not pay within the applicable period, the landlord may pursue an eviction claim through the RDC. The centre considers the claim and supporting evidence before issuing a decision.

A missed payment does not give a landlord the right to immediately take possession of the property. The required notice and legal procedures still apply.

Other Grounds for Early Eviction Under Article 25

Non-payment is not the only reason a landlord may seek eviction before a tenancy contract expires.

Article 25 also covers other circumstances, including:

  • Using the property for an unlawful purpose: Where the tenant uses the property or allows it to be used for an illegal purpose or in a way that violates public order or morals.
  • Leaving commercial premises unoccupied: A tenant may face eviction if a commercial property is left unoccupied without a valid reason for 30 consecutive days or 90 non-consecutive days within a year, unless the parties have agreed otherwise.
  • Breaching legal or contractual obligations: A landlord may seek eviction if the tenant fails to meet a legal or contractual obligation and does not remedy the breach within 30 days after receiving the required notice.

The applicable conditions and notification requirements depend on the specific ground being relied upon.

Why Paying Late Did Not Prevent the Eviction

A tenant may assume that paying the full outstanding balance at any point will resolve a rental dispute. However, the Business Bay case shows why the timing of payment matters.

The tenant submitted an offer-and-deposit certificate only after the 30-day notice period had expired. The committee did not accept this late attempt as a reason to prevent eviction.

There is an important distinction when a landlord refuses to accept rent.

Dubai provides a formal offer-and-deposit procedure through the RDC. Under the Dubai Land Department's guidance, a tenant can apply to deposit the rental amount through the centre when the landlord refuses payment. Once the judge accepts the application, the tenant is considered to have paid from the date of acceptance.

This procedure should not be confused with simply attempting to pay after a legal deadline has passed. Tenants who encounter payment refusal should seek guidance on the formal process promptly rather than relying on informal arrangements.

The lesson from this case is not that every late payment automatically results in eviction. Rather, the outcome depends on the circumstances, the applicable notice requirements and whether the parties have complied with the relevant legal procedures.